GOVERNANCE · RISK · COMPLIANCE · ASSURANCE

GRC Gap Analysis:
from compliance theater to evidence.

A gap analysis should expose where mission objectives, obligations, controls, evidence, ownership, and operating reality diverge, then convert those differences into a prioritized remediation program.

Operating principle: a control is not mature because a policy says it exists. It is mature when ownership is clear, implementation is observable, evidence is repeatable, exceptions are governed, and leadership understands residual risk.
LAUNCH INTERACTIVE GRC ASSESSMENT →

THE MODEL

Six lenses for finding the real gap.

01 · Governance

Decision rights, accountability, policy hierarchy, risk appetite, committees, exceptions, and executive reporting.

02 · Risk

Asset and business context, threat scenarios, likelihood, impact, treatment, acceptance, dependencies, and residual risk.

03 · Controls

Administrative, technical, and physical safeguards mapped to requirements and implemented at the correct scope.

04 · Evidence

Logs, configurations, tickets, approvals, tests, inventories, attestations, metrics, and proof that controls operate.

05 · Compliance

Applicable laws, contracts, policies, standards, regulatory duties, audit commitments, and customer obligations.

06 · Resilience

Detection, response, recovery, continuity, third-party failure, exercises, lessons learned, and measurable improvement.

REFERENCE STACK

Crosswalk once. Reuse everywhere.

Build a common control spine instead of treating every framework as a separate universe. A practical enterprise baseline can map control objectives across NIST CSF 2.0, NIST SP 800-53, NIST RMF, NIST AI RMF, CIS Controls, Zero Trust principles, privacy requirements, contractual obligations, and sector-specific requirements where applicable.

Control objective first.

Describe the outcome before mapping framework identifiers.

Many-to-one mapping.

One strong control and evidence package can satisfy multiple overlapping requirements.

Scope is explicit.

Identify systems, data, identities, vendors, facilities, AI models, agents, and processes covered.

Evidence has a clock.

Record owner, source, freshness, retention, test frequency, and source of truth.

ASSESSMENT ENGINE

Score the gap, not the paperwork.

Maturity: 0 absent · 1 ad hoc · 2 documented · 3 implemented · 4 measured · 5 continuously improved.

Evidence: none · anecdotal · partial · repeatable · independently verifiable.

The interactive engine applies this model across 24 controls, calculates domain and overall maturity, measures evidence confidence, identifies sub-3 gaps, and creates a prioritized 30/60/90-day view.

BEGIN ASSESSMENT →
The goal is not to become compliant on paper. Know what must be true, prove what is true, expose what is not, and govern the difference.

EXECUTIVE OUTPUT

Turn GRC into a navigation system.

Top enterprise risks

Material scenarios, exposure, treatment status and accountable ownership.

Control health

Coverage, effectiveness, evidence confidence, exceptions and dependencies.

Compliance posture

Obligations, deficiencies, commitments, deadlines and accepted exceptions.

Remediation economics

What gets funded first, why it reduces risk, dependencies and the risk of delay.